Your Questions
Your Questions
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am seriously interested in reducing size of my stomach/abdomen with minimal down time and invasion. Is this what laser liposuction can do? I am researching my options.
A: It would be good to talk you through many of your liposuction options and get a realistic understanding of how they work and what can be achieved. There is no such thing as any liposuction method that has any different amount of invasiveness or recovery. That is a misconception propagated on the internet by various marketing and promotional efforts as well as many device manufacturers. While there are numerous liposuction techniques that use different energies to achieve their effects, they all are invasive surgery, traumatic the tissues significantly and involve recovery that would not be considered quick or minimal particularly over a large area like the abdomen.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
When a product or manufacturer calls itself ‘smart’, there should be a good reason. Such is the case with the plastic surgery method known as Smartlipo. Highly touted as a better and more efficient method of liposuction, its name clearly suggests that it is better than traditional or ‘dumb’ liposuction. Grandiose claims are made all over the internet, most of which by doctors who use this liposuction technique. The manufacturer of the liposuction device, Cynosure, focuses on the established science behind it.
Smartlipo is a laser technique for melting fat to make it easier to extract. By first heating up the fat to a specific temperature, like oil in a cooking pan, it is turned from a solid into a liquid. This is done by using a laser probe that is passed through the fat area until the right temperature is reached. Then a liposuction cannula is used to remove by vacuum the oily liquid and any other fatty chunks in the area.
But what makes this liposuction so smart and why is it better? First, what it isn’t. Because a laser is involved, many potential patients think it is not invasive surgery. It is just as invasive as traditional liposuction which means there will be a recovery. This is not some magical approach that works from outside the body. Just because it is a laser, it doesn’t really zap the fat like a video game. It is about raising the temperature of the fatty zone until the fat begins to melt. The laser is just a way to heat the fat like the burner on the stove.
What makes Smartlipo better is that it creates a global melting effect which removes more fat than suction alone. Because of the heat damage, more fat is lost later than just what comes out at the time of surgery. Fat continues to die days to weeks later, thus the full effect of the fat removed is not really seen for months even though the early results are apparent within weeks after the procedure. This heating effect also accounts for its skin tightening capability. Such an effect, however, is almost always overstated and over expected. Do not expect Smartlipo to replace what a tummy tuck or armlift can do.
While many doctors tout Smartlipo as being done under local anesthesia with little recovery, this is often not so. Because there is considerable heat generated during the procedure, it is not hard to see that local anesthesia is often not enough for a comfortable operative experience. One can only remove enough fat if the patient is comfortable and will allow it. It is not a test to see who is the toughest. This is why I recommend a general anesthetic. The best result in the shortest period of time can be done when the maximal amount of fat can be comfortably removed.
Recovery from Smartlipo is not much different than traditional liposuction. While the amount of fat removed can be better, this does not mean there is less recovery. The laser does result in less pain and bruising but the amount of swelling is about the same, requiring months to eventually see the final body contouring effect.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: I would like to know more about laser liposuction. I had two C-Section deliveries and abundance of skin because of it.
A: While laser liposuction does have the ability to tighten some skin, it is not a replacement for a tummy tuck. Your description of having had two pregnancies with C-sections and now an ‘abundance of skin’ suggests that your skin excess problem is not slight. In addition, the skin that is there has lost its elasticity (which is why there is an abundance) and does not have the ability to respond to the tightening caused by the heating effect of the laser. Such loose abdominal skin is always more effectively removed by an excisional procedure, aka a tummy tuck.
Laser liposuction, often called Smartlipo, is an improved method of fat removal than traditional liposuction. By using a laser probe to create an elevated temperature in a zone of fat, the fat cells break apart and loose their lipid content. This not only makes it easier to suction out, but fat cell damage continues beyond the surgical period much like the progression of a burn injury on the skin. Even some fat cells which were not directly injured by the laser probe at the time for surgery may go on to die later from the laser injury. This produces more fat loss in the days ahead. Whether that amount of fat loss is significant or not depends on how high and uniform the temperatures were at the time of the laser liposuction procedure.
The skin tightening effect of laser liposuction is similarly caused by the heat created. The temperatures must be high enough and close enough to the underside of the skin for this effect to be created however. Whether that occurs is dependent on the skill and the expertise of the physician driving the laser probe.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis Indiana
Q: Can “love handle” surgery be combined with the hip and inner thigh area? I have lost several pounds through the years. I was told laser treatment to melt the fat would be the way to go, but not sure what would happen with the excess skin?
A: It is very common to combine at least two, and often, up to five areas at a time during liposuction surgery. It is actually very uncommon to do just one area. Since liposuction is about reshaping body areas, it usually takes several areas at a time to get the best result. The only limit that I put on liposuction in my Indianapolis plastic surgery practice is the amount of volume removal and time, which are closely aligned. I have learned by experience that it is usually best to get a single session of fat volume removal under five liters or 5,000 ccs. If more is required, then the liposuction procedure should be done in stages. This decreases the potential risk of complications and makes the recovery more tolerable for the patient.
How much skin exists around a liposuction area is critical in determining what type of result can be obtained. The skin can shrink only so much even with laser liposuction or Smartlipo. If too much skin exists, then one may need to consider some type of excisional procedure. This is particularly relevant in the neck, arms, abdomen, and inner thigh areas.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: I am interested in getting liposuction done on my stomach and flanks but am confused about the different types that I have read about. There appears to be regular liposuction, ultrasonic, laser, water jet…and and even something like ultrasonic done from the outside without surgery. Which type of liposuction is the best?
A: Liposuction has come a long way since its first introduction in the United States in 1981. It is a two-part process during surgery that involves the first phase of breaking up the fat and a second phase of removing or suctioning it out. All of the advancements in liposuction have come forth for the first phase, different methods to help loosen up the fat for evacuation.
One highly touted liposuction method that is neither new or novel is that of tumescence. This is an original advance in liposuction that began to be used in the mid-1980s and is part of every liposuction procedure today. Prior to doing phase one particulation, a special solution is first instilled that provides numbness to the treated area and helps cut down the extreme bleeding that would otherwise occur. This does make it possible for small areas of liposuction to be done under local anesthesia, but is also used even when you are going to sleep for the procedure.
Most of the advancements in liposuction that are highly marketed and promoted on the internet are relatively new. Whether one method really offers any improvement over the other has yet to be proven no matter what the endorsement and advertisement says. My current preference is for laser liposuction, branded as Smartlipo. We all know that fat is very sensitive to heat and can be melted as is observed during cooking. So the concept of heating up a treated area makes sense and is something that can really be felt during surgery. It is usually touted as also having skin tightening capabilities, and while I have observed that some of that does occur, it will not solve skin laxity problems where more than an inch of excess skin is present.
No matter what the tool that is being used, the most important element in getting good liposuction results is the experience and skill of the one holding the instrument or device. One of the real negatives to technology (and probably the only one) is that it enables those surgeons of lesser skill or training (and sometimes not a surgeon at all) to look equal to others of extraordinary experience and expertise.
At this time, I would be leary of any device that offers significant fat reduction through some method of external application. While the concept is harmless and certainly appealing, what you really risk is your money. If you are prepared to be dieting and exercising and doing everything to help lose weight anyway, then these device approaches may be reasonable. I suspect they do offer some benefit in the very weight loss conscious patient who is even more motivated by their economic investment. It is probably the ‘coach potatoes’ who make up the greatest percent of failed results with these devices.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Too much fat is a near ubiquitous problem. The sheer number of weight loss diets, medications, and exercise programs that we are inundated with each day is a testament to their ‘popularity’. Accompanying these fat concerns, to no surprise, is the desire for liposuction as a surgical fat removal method. Liposuction is by both number and surface area the most common cosmetic plastic surgery procedure in the United States.
Contrary to the perception of some is that most liposuction patients are not trying to use it as a weight loss method. Almost every liposuction patient that I have ever seen in my Indianapolis plastic surgery practice has come in with a history of diet and exercise efforts. Whether it is the 35 year-old mother who can’t get that stomach pouch off after her second child or the very trim 42 year-old male who just can’t get rid of those stubborn love handles, liposuction is usually sought out for the right reason…as a spot method of body contouring.
As potential patients seek out liposuction today, they are surrounded by an array of technology that did not exist just ten years ago. And such information is freely available for their assessment on the internet. Between marketing ads and alleged patient testimonials, every manufacturer and many doctor’s practices tout one liposuction method over another. Whether it is tumescent, ultrasonic, laser, water jet or cold liposuction, they all seem to be the ‘best’. At the least, many are relatively new and after all newer is better…isn’t it?
To understand this maze of liposuction technology, it is important to appreciate how the liposuction process actually works. Essentially, it is a two-part process. Simplistically, the first part of liposuction requires that the fat be loosened by some method. The second part is that the loosened fat is then suctioned out. All the different liposuction techniologies need to use the second phase, suctioning. The difference between all of them is in the first part, the method they use to loosen up the fat.
In traditional ‘old-style’ liposuction, good old elbow grease is how the fat is gotten free. Most everyone has a good vision of how that is done by the in and out motion of a cannula that looks like a good beating up, to quote quite a few patients. In ultrasonic liposuction, it is the high intensity sound waves that do it. With laser, it is the heat and melting of the fat. With water jet, it is the high pressure of water. With cold, it is the reverse thermal effect of heat that does it.
I have left out the tumescent method as it is not really a liposuction method per se. Every liposuction technique first infuses a fluid to make the suctioning part easier, to make the treated site numb, and to lessen bleeding. It is called tumescence because it inflates or tumesces the planned treated area. It is necessary to do this first for all liposuction methods. While this may have been a liposuction advance by the late 1980s and early 90s, it is standard today and not a novel liposuction approach.
While great and appealing arguments can be made for each of these liposuction technologies, the reality is that none of these methods have been proven or shown to be better than another. They are accepted techniques that can make for an acceptable liposuction outcome. The most important technology or technique, however, remains that of the hands and the experience of the plastic surgeon wielding the device. The greatest tool ever made is only as good as the person using it. Conversely, skill and experience can make an average tool do a great job. More focus should be placed on that assessment by potential patients, if possible, than the allure of the next great liposuction wand.
Dr. Barry Eppley